Whether you need one to slow the spread of Covid-19, or because you live in a smog filled city, or to wear over your eyes to block out reality, you need a mask.
A unique mask.
Not just because I’m trying to sell you something (if “sell” applies to things that are free), but because having a unique mask means you don’t accidentally take someone else’s gross mask. You know, the one they were using as a napkin after eating spaghetti.
But where can you find unique masks?
Ahhh, now I’m going to start selling you things. (Just kidding.)
Threadless.com, an online business that does printed shirts (and other stuff), has recently begun doing prints for masks, and to kick that off they’re running a mask design competition, where they’re going to decide the winner by vote.
So of course I entered the competition, and here’s my mask:
The Mask of Avoiding Awkward Conversation is a very special mask. Unlike your run of the mill masks which simply try to protect you from Covid-19/regular flu/smog, this mask is meant to deflect unwanted conversation. How? By making your voice so muffled no one can sustain a conversation with you.
And, of course, if you’re a Munchkin/D&D/any RPG geek, this mask also gives you a +5 to meet people of like humour and/or mind, which is always a bonus (unless, of course, you don’t want to, in which case you can just wear the mask inside out, but that’s not the point).
Of course, all of this only happens if the mask gets printed. But thankfully, all it needs to get printed is your vote.
So if you could all do me a favour and stuff the ballot box in my favour, I’d be delighted. You can vote for it here. A nice “5” would be appreciated. (Or a 4. Or a 3. Beggars can’t be choosers.)
Thanks for the support, and stay stealthy, my friends.
As the Covid-19 pandemic rages across the globe and more and more people are isolating or quarantining themselves, the question is being asked, “What on earth do I do cooped up for 14 days?”
The first two days might seem like a holiday. Sleeping in, bingeing Netflix, shuffling around in pyjamas (or out of them) and endless scrolling through coronavirus memes on Instagram. The recipe for a perfect weekend.
And suddenly, wearing matching clothes for three consecutive days doesn’t seem like such a great achievement.
And that, my friend, is where reading books comes in.
There are a whole host of reasons to read books, but there are particular bonuses to reading during a quarantine:
It passes the time. (Of course, TV does that too, but books somehow give you less guilt. I don’t know why.)
No pseudo-intellectuals who disparage light reading that you will meet in your commute/workplace can give you a long look down their heavy glasses that hang of the edge of their nose and say, “hmm? You call that a book? I thought it was a rag with words on it.”
Your Internet bill is spared.
Taking hip Instagram photos of a good book and a drink looks sooooo much better than taking an Instagram photo of your coffee and your Netflix login page.
Saying, “I read two/three/ten novels while in isolation” basically trumps anything your colleagues can say about their quarantines. (Unless, of course, someone really did invent another form of calculus. Or paint the next Mona Lisa. Or write the next Man Booker laureate.)
And of course, publishers, eager to help, have updated many classics with a modern, 2020 twist.
Here’s the catalogue.
Now, unless you’re an insane speed reader, this collection of books will last you far longer than two weeks of quarantine, so to help you narrow down your selection, here’s a brief summary of each. (Full disclosure, I read maybe 0.85 of the 9 books above, so if my description is off, blame the Wikipedia summary.)
Its premise is simple: humanity is fighting a group of half-human half animals called the “Savages” whose hobby is to bash people’s faces in. Ren, our hero, is a child soldier part of the global coalition to stop them.
With plenty of action and adventure, twists and turns, Teo’s debut novel is an impressive work.
But the fact stands that it’s a debut novel by a developing author, and Teo still has a way to go. (Read it anyway though. Preferably before you read the SPOILERS BELOW.)
But to say that they’re not doing work simply because they love it is to be mistaken. (Okay, I’ll admit I look at pro video gamers with an eye of “is it even okay to be making money like that?” but I’m not denying the work that goes into their jobs.)
But it isn’t just racially charged books that have come under fire. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory’s oompa loompas and The Chronicles of Narnia‘s Calormen have been targeted as caricatures as well, and it seems the latest target is Dr. Seuss’s work, which, as it turns out, when not completely white and male, contains a handful of stereotyped Asian and African characters.
As these books are thrown out of curriculums, they’re being replaced by “works about and by people of colour”.
Which is perfectly fine. It’s time people expanded their reading horizons.
But not, I think, by throwing out what’s already there. (Because that doesn’t expand your horizon, it just shifts it.)
I mean, it’s great people are reading stories by people of colour, or “minorities”, or whatever the fashion is to call “those other people” are these days. (Being Asian, I’m not up to date on our latest non-offensive classification. Sorry about that.)
And I understand why westerns schools are so concerned with trying not to mock the rest of us, and thus are so conscientious about culling books that misrepresent us.
But honestly, I think the problem has been blown out of proportion. While it has been “proven” that racism and prejudices get ingrained young and absorbed unconsciously through media like books, I think with a trained specialist around to help the kids, we can still read such books without absorbing the racism in them.
Over the years, from watching many movies and television shows, I’ve come to realise something: making sequels is hard.
Sequels are more difficult that original shows because sequels have to “live up to the original”.
What that means most people are still working it out.
Some directors decide to make sequels with a totally different feel, like George Lucas with his prequel trilogy. (The results of that can be debated.) Others decide to just make more of the same, like J. J. Abrams did with The Force Awakens. (It was warmly received, but I debated that way back when.)
What’s the best way to create a sequel? I don’t know.
However, I do recognise a great sequel when I see one.
Of these, adaptations fall into three general categories:
Got mauled (Percy Jackson and the Olympians)
Faithful adaptation (Ender’s Game)
Next-level amazing (Well, we’re getting there)
Everyone hears about the film adaptations that ruined the story. Those are the ones that get bookworms puking and spitting and whining in general.
Then there are faithful adaptations. These are good, but can feel staid, because the story is exactly the same, which, given that film and books are different mediums, shouldn’t be.
Then there are the movies which take the books to the next level. Not only do they retain the key elements of the book, they also add some brilliant elements that turn the story for a great one, into an amazing film.
If you’ve been following entertainment news recently, you probably heard that the Oscars are introducing a new category to their awards ceremony: the “popular” movie category.
So far, no one is taking the news well. The Academy has been roundly mocked for their desperate attempt to increase interest in their ceremony, and everyone has been asking the same question: what on earth is a “popular” film?